Subway, one of the world’s largest sandwich chains, has recently been the target of a lawsuit in the United States. The central accusation is that the company is promoting “highly misleading” advertisements, representing its sandwiches as being more filling than they actually are. This new lawsuit raises a debate about marketing practices and the transparency that large fast-food chains should have with their customers, especially in times of inflation.
The Case: What is Being Alleged Against Subway?
New York resident Anna Tollison filed a lawsuit against Subway after purchasing a Steak & Cheese sandwich that she claimed contained approximately 200% less meat than advertised. According to the lawsuit, Subway displays images in its promotional material that “materially exaggerate” the amount of ingredients, particularly meat and cheese, misleading consumers. Tollison argues that the difference between the actual sandwich and the one advertised is significant and that Subway’s practices end up financially harming consumers, especially low-income consumers who are already struggling due to high prices.
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, and Tollison's attorneys hope the case will be recognized as a class action, allowing other consumers to also be represented and compensated for what they consider to be a deceptive practice.
A History of Controversies
This latest lawsuit against Subway is not an isolated one; in fact, the company has a history of facing lawsuits over false advertising claims. In a high-profile case from 2017, Subway faced a class action lawsuit alleging that its famous “foot-long” sandwiches were often shorter than promised. Although the company promised to implement quality controls to ensure the correct size, the lawsuit was ultimately dismissed, with the judge arguing that the benefits to consumers would be minimal compared to the cost of the lawsuit.
Additionally, in 2021, Subway was sued over claims that its “tuna” filling did not actually contain any real tuna. Although the case was dropped, the accusation generated significant media and social media coverage, highlighting the chain’s quality and marketing practices.
Subway and Other Chains Under Pressure from Consumers
Subway isn't the only food giant to face this kind of criticism. Other chains like McDonald's, Wendy's and Taco Bell have also faced similar lawsuits in which consumers have claimed that the products they received were significantly smaller or different than promised. These lawsuits highlight a growing trend of dissatisfied consumers who, in times of inflation, expect companies to deliver exactly what they advertise.
For example, McDonald's and Burger King recently faced a class action lawsuit alleging that the burgers shown in their advertisements were "inflatedly larger" than the actual products served to customers. These class actions have brought to the fore a debate about the role of marketing in fast food chains and what is considered acceptable in terms of advertising exaggeration.
The Importance of Transparency in Times of Economic Crisis
These lawsuits reflect the growing importance consumers are placing on transparency. In times of inflation and rising food prices, transparency about the quantity and quality of ingredients promised becomes essential. With the rising cost of living, many consumers, especially those on lower incomes, rely on chains like Subway for affordable, quality meals.
According to Tollison's lawsuit, Subway's practices end up hurting these consumers financially, as they pay for a quantity of product that does not correspond to reality. This dissatisfaction reflects a demand for more accountability from fast-food chains regarding the quality and quantity of the products offered.
The Relevance of the Case and What Can Change in the Sector
The outcome of this case could influence other fast food and restaurant chains’ marketing and advertising practices. With increasing pressure from consumers and the legal system for these chains to be more transparent, it is possible that some changes will begin to occur, such as new guidelines for more realistic advertising campaigns.
Although Subway has not yet officially commented on the new lawsuit, the chain is under scrutiny, and the case continues to be closely followed by the media and the public. If the court accepts the lawsuit as a class action, Subway could face a financial impact and significant damage to its image, especially among consumers who prioritize transparency and honesty from brands.
The new lawsuit against Subway in the US reflects a recurring problem for many fast food chains: the gap between what is advertised and what is actually delivered to the consumer. In a period of rising prices and changing consumer behavior, Subway and other chains face the need to adapt to a public that is more demanding when it comes to the veracity of their advertising.
English 
Portuguese